Apple’s Pricing Strategy – Contrary to Naysayers, Apple has weighed its options well

Image representing Apple as depicted in CrunchBase

Image via CrunchBase

The options of Apple in pricing are really tight and product innovation aside, I personally think they are doing quite well in terms of weighing in what they had chosen to launch along with other critical factors. Among these critical factors include:
I) price points that the competition currently fills,
II) extent of cannibalisation that they are willing to absorb,
III) the market share that they are willing to win or cede in the countries that they are in
IV) the shelf life of iPhone 5C before Samsung which is its nearest competitor responds with the next phone
V) the brand as a premium offering to the market
By dropping $160 from their usual offering which is now in its 5S version, Apple has essentially created a cheaper option that will grant it leverage in a price sensitive market. Still too expensive for China they say? I’m doubtful about that. As a personal estimate, that price differential will give it the edge and bring at least 3 – 5pp. of market share more globally. In total, it is likely to make at least the same profit after cannibalisation thrown into the mix. Whether Samsung has its Galaxy Gear in first mover advantage is irrelevant in this consideration at this point because the idea of marrying the phone and the watch has yet to gain much traction to cause considerable shifts.
It is not known at this point of writing how much cheaper the coloured version is in terms of manufacturing cost per unit, but even with the cost complexities now in the mix, it has been calculated to provide Apple with the necessary buffer with the trade-offs of profit margin vs market share balanced well.
In the absence of a blue-ocean strategy at this point in time, if it secures a following in the middle-upper class of rising China for Asia, Baumol-ly speaking, revenue and market share will give it the edge and sustainability for at least 3-5 years of rapid expansion into the pockets of this class. Too low a pricing would hurt the brand and over-cannibalise itself. $160 less in that sense, is optimally balanced.

Follow the Magazine:
(After you have filled in your email address in the column at the right hand side of the screen, a confirmation email will sent to your email address. You will have to confirm it before subscription begins)

Follow us on Twitter:

Like us on Facebook:

**As part of the Magazine’s drive to reward subscribers/followers, we will be providing subscribers/followers special access to exclusive content which will not be otherwise available to normal visitors. Please be sure to subscribe to the Magazine. Many visitors have given us positive comments that they will be bookmarking the site, but as the system is unable to capture a working email address to which the passcodes for exclusive content will be sent, they will miss out on this content. Do note that passcodes are locked to each exclusive content, not a one-for-all access, so do provide a working email address that you check regularly so as not to miss out on them!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s