How State Ownership Hampered Entrepreneurship in Chinese Companies

Agricultural Bank of China  in  guangzhou
© Photographer: Hupeng |

For state-owned companies in China, the significant detriment in employing innovation may be linked to the company’s ownership structure, according to a new study on Chinese entrepreneurship by Chinese business experts at Rice University, the University of Hong Kong, Texas Christian University, Jilin University and Shantou University.

 

The researchers found that the more equity the state owned of a company, the less likely the company was to engage in strategic entrepreneurship (investing in research and development and other innovations) to gain market share. This emphasis on strategic entrepreneurship in transition economies is critical as nations seek to revitalize existing state-owned companies. However, such efforts must be thought out and designed well, the authors said.

 

The findings are the result of the authors’ study of 1,095 Chinese business-group-affiliated companies during a period of institutional friction in 1999; the researchers expected to find a potential conflict between emergent institutions encouraging strategic entrepreneurship and those still creating pressure for maintenance of the status quo. The authors examined how such institutional friction impacts firms’ strategic choices regarding corporate entrepreneurship and innovation.

 

“Although both formal systems designed to reward strategic-entrepreneurship activities and informal systems to develop new cultures are important in creating the desired strategic outcomes, their effectiveness is hampered by the embedded state philosophy,” said Robert Hoskisson, one of the study’s co-authors and the George R. Brown Professor of Strategic Management at Rice’s Jones Graduate School of Business.

 

“We believe that the results of this study provide insights for managers and policymakers in transition economies by highlighting the means and constraints that are available to encourage strategic entrepreneurship.” A transition economy is an economy that is shifting from a centrally planned structure toward a more free market. China is doing so very gradually. The former Soviet Union used the so-called “big bang” approach of very quickly privatizing state-owned firms, often through auction.

 

The researchers studied competing institutional philosophies measured through a company’s founding leadership and ownership history and through the impact of formal and informal controls emphasized in newly formed business groups and how they influence company actions. Formal systems were manifested in the use of objective financial control measures to reward and discipline member firms; informal control efforts to indoctrinate new values and norms were represented by the socialization and development of a strong group culture.

 

The authors found that the original institutional philosophy of state control and ownership remained a potent factor among the Chinese companies, while the new institutional philosophy in support of strategic entrepreneurship took place through business groups’ informal and formal organization controls. They also found that state philosophy caused rigidity and inflexibility for companies to react to the new institutional demands, thus weakening the positive effects of business groups’ formal and informal controls on strategic entrepreneurship.

 

The authors advocated that managers and policymakers of state-operated enterprises need to be cautious about the consistency between the institutionalization of new organizational practices and governance and control of the firms. “Although the use of formal controls that rely on structuration to sanction and set norms for appropriate behaviors may be more effective in the short run, for long-term effectiveness, a supportive cultural change for an emphasis on strategic entrepreneurship is needed,” the authors said. Transition economies are a significant part of the world economy, the authors emphasized.

 

“However, forward economic movement in such nations will require a greater understanding of strategic entrepreneurship in former state enterprises,” they said. “This research has helped lay the foundation for a greater understanding, but more research is still required.”

The paper will be published in Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.

 

###

Share this post through your social networks!

Follow the Magazine: https://businessleadershipmanagement.wordpress.com/subscribe-follow-the-magazine/

(After you have filled in your email address in the column at the right hand side of the screen, a confirmation email will sent to your email address. You will have to confirm it before subscription begins. Subscription is FREE)

Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/BusinessLeaders

Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BusinessLeadershipManagement

**As part of the Magazine’s drive to reward subscribers/followers, we will be providing subscribers/followers special access to exclusive content which will not be otherwise available to normal visitors. Please be sure to subscribe to the Magazine. Many visitors have given us positive comments that they will be bookmarking the site, but as the system is unable to capture a working email address to which the passcodes for exclusive content will be sent, they will miss out on this content. Do note that passcodes are locked to each exclusive content, not a one-for-all access, so do provide a working email address that you check regularly so as not to miss out on them!

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s